CFTC Clarifies Swaps Rules for Prediction Markets & Gambling

Jonathan Rodriguez

Written by: Jonathan Rodriguez

Published: Tue Oct 13, 2026, 11:00 am ET

Read Time: 4 minutes

CFTC Clarifies Swaps Rules for Prediction Markets & Gambling

industry

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has introduced two regulatory measures aimed at distinguishing prediction markets from traditional gambling. Announced on October 9, 2026, the actions address how federal law classifies event contracts and conventional sportsbook wagers.

The CFTC's move comes amid mounting legal challenges from state regulators over prediction-market oversight. New Jersey and the National Football League (NFL) have also urged the US Supreme Court to review the dispute. 

Both fronts seek clarity on whether federal or state authorities should regulate sports-related event contracts.

CFTC Advances Two Regulatory Measures

The CFTC proposed explicitly including qualifying event contracts within the federal definition of swaps. These contracts cover outcomes involving sports, politics, cultural events, and weather, among other subjects.

CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig defended the agency's position, emphasizing the financial role of these products.

"Americans use event contracts to hedge risks, speculate, and provide the public with information about the outcome of future events," Selig said. "These products are commodity derivatives squarely within the CFTC's regulatory remit under the Commodity Exchange Act and are within the agency's exclusive jurisdiction."

Alongside the proposal, the agency issued an interim final rule excluding certain gambling activities from the swaps definition. The measure covers qualifying sportsbook wagers and casino gambling products offered under state or tribal authorization.

"Casino-style gambling products are not derivatives," Selig said, noting that the measure serves to clarify "the boundaries of our regulatory authority."

Both measures have 30-day comment periods, respectively. Together, the actions seek to distinguish federally regulated event contracts from conventional gambling products. However, the measures have different procedural statuses, and the proposed rule remains subject to public comment.

Prediction Markets Face Growing Legal Challenges

The CFTC's actions arrive amid a broader dispute over whether federal or state authorities should regulate sports-related prediction markets.

Platforms such as Kalshi offer event contracts that allow participants to trade on sporting outcomes. However, state regulators argue that these products can function like sports wagers and should comply with applicable gambling laws.

New Jersey has asked the Supreme Court to review the dispute, seeking clarity over the division of regulatory authority. The NFL filed an amicus brief on October 8 supporting New Jersey's request.

The league argues that sports-related prediction contracts resemble gambling rather than financial derivatives. It has also raised concerns about consumer safeguards, insider trading, and the integrity of sporting competitions.

The NFL highlighted the scale of the activity, reporting that NFL-related contracts accounted for $1.8 billion of $3.3 billion in prediction-market trading volume on the season's opening Sunday.

The dispute has gained significance following conflicting federal appellate court decisions. A Supreme Court review could help determine whether states can apply their gambling laws to sports event contracts offered by prediction-market platforms.

Implications for US Online Sportsbooks and Prediction Markets

The CFTC's regulatory approach could shape competition between prediction-market platforms and established betting operators. Traditional US online sportsbooks operate under state-specific licensing requirements, while prediction-market companies argue that federal oversight provides a consistent national framework.

If the CFTC's position prevails, prediction-market operators could retain broader access to sports-related contracts. Conversely, a ruling favoring state authority could force platforms to navigate different gambling laws and licensing requirements across jurisdictions.

The NFL's intervention also puts consumer protection and sporting integrity at the center of the debate. The league has called for stronger restrictions on potentially manipulable contracts, insider trading safeguards, and a minimum trading age of 21.

However, prediction-market operators maintain that federal oversight can provide consistent standards across state lines. The CFTC has also defended its engagement with sports organizations on market integrity.

Ultimately, the regulatory measures could influence how platforms structure their products and manage compliance. Nevertheless, their longer-term impact will depend on the final rulemaking process and the courts' interpretation of federal authority.

The Supreme Court's response to New Jersey's petition could prove particularly significant. Until then, the CFTC's actions clarify its regulatory position without conclusively resolving the wider dispute.

Jonathan Rodriguez
Jonathan Rodriguez

Jonathan is an avid basketball fan, and is often looking forward to the next upcoming NBA season when not checking players' stats during games. He also likes to keep his ears on the ground for the latest rumblings in the online casino industry.

This site contains commercial content. We may be compensated for the links provided on this page. The content on this page is for informational purposes only. Betting News makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information given or the outcome of any game or event.